#9449: The summary printed after running doctests is inaccurate.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Old description:
> The following shows a summary of a doctest failures. They were actually
> observed on a Solaris machine, but that is unlikely to be relevant. After
> building Sage
>
> {{{
> $ make ptestlong
> }}}
>
> was executed.
>
> * 5 of the 6 doctest failures in the summary have 0 tests failing.
> * BSD.py is the only one of the 6 doctest failures which has a non-zero
> number of failures.
>
> {{{
>
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst # 0
> doctests failed
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/plane_curves/constructor.py
> # 0 doctests failed
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py # 1
> doctests failed
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py # 0 doctests
> failed
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx # 0
> doctests failed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total time for all tests: 3990.8 seconds
> }}}
>
> In the case of one of the tests, it would appear from the log that it
> actually passed
>
> {{{
> sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py
> [44.0 s]
> }}}
>
> This is pretty damn serious, as it means we can not rely on the doctest
> results.
>
> == Hardware and software used ==
> * sage-4.5.alpha4
> * A Sun T5240
> * 2 x 8 core, 64-thread UltraSPARC T2+ 1167 MHz
> * 32 GB RAM
> * Solaris 10 update 7 (05/09)
> * t2.math.washtington.edu
> * gcc 4.4.1 configured to use both the Sun linker and assembler.
> * MD5 checksum of matplotlib-1.0.0.spkg was
> cb9f3cb0ec3da550d2d67ea7e8b6094f
> * 32-bit build (This is the default). The environment variable
> {{{SAGE64}}} was '''not''' used.
New description:
The following shows a summary of a doctest failures. They were actually
observed on a Solaris machine, but that is unlikely to be relevant. After
building Sage
{{{
$ make ptestlong
}}}
was executed.
* 5 of the 6 doctest failures in the summary have 0 tests failing.
* BSD.py is the only one of the 6 doctest failures which has a non-zero
number of failures.
{{{
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst # 0
doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/plane_curves/constructor.py
# 0 doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py # 1
doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py # 0 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx # 0 doctests
failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 3990.8 seconds
}}}
In the case of one of the tests, it would appear from the log that it
actually passed
{{{
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py
[44.0 s]
}}}
This is pretty damn serious, as it means we can not rely on the doctest
results.
== Hardware and software used ==
* sage-4.5.alpha4
* A Sun T5240
* 2 x 8 core, 64-thread UltraSPARC T2+ 1167 MHz
* 32 GB RAM
* Solaris 10 update 7 (05/09)
* t2.math.washtington.edu
* gcc 4.4.1 configured to use both the Sun linker and assembler.
* 32-bit build (This is the default). The environment variable
{{{SAGE64}}} was '''not''' used.
--
Comment(by drkirkby):
I've attached a log.
Also corrected something which was cut and pasted from another ticket
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9449#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
