#9051: Fast function field arithmetic
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  robertwb  |       Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.5  
  Component:  algebra   |    Keywords:            
     Author:            |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:            
Work_issues:            |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by was):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 I took sage-4.4.4 and applied trac_9051-flattened_and_rebased.patch.
 Doctesting just rings/ fails very seriously after applying this patch:

 {{{

 sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/

 The following tests failed:

         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/residue_field.pyx # 16
 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/order.py # 3
 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element_quadratic.pyx # 2
 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py # 1 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/ring.pyx # 5 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx # 2 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx # 7 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/integer_ring.pyx # 5 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/galois_group.py #
 8 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx # 7 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/misc.py # 1 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_base.pyx # 13 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/qqbar.py # 4 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py # 10 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py # 15 doctests failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_singular_interface.py # 1 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx # 13 doctests failed
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Timings have been updated.
 Total time for all tests: 64.0 seconds
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9051#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to