#8495: Regression: Many mathematica doctests now fail
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: flawrence | Owner: flawrence
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: interfaces | Keywords:
Author: Felix Lawrence | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Mike Hansen | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by flawrence):
Replying to [comment:5 mhansen]:
> There is dictionary in place from Mathematica to Sage.
>
{{{
sage: sage.symbolic.pynac.symbol_table['mathematica']
{'Log[2]': log2, 'Cos': cos, 'DiracDelta': dirac_delta, 'EulerGamma':
euler_gamma, 'Glaisher': glaisher, 'Sqrt': <function sqrt at 0x2c20f50>,
'Factorial': factorial, 'Khinchin': khinchin, 'Catalan': catalan,
'(1+Sqrt[5])/2': golden_ratio, 'Binomial': binomial, 'PolyGamma': psi,
'HeavisideTheta': heaviside, 'KroneckerDelta': kronecker_delta, 'Pi': pi,
'UnitStep': unit_step, 'Sin': sin, 'Gamma': gamma, 'Sign': sgn}
}}}
Excellent! I've updated the patch so that it uses that dictionary. I also
added the ability to pass a locals dictionary to _sage_, which complements
and/or overrides the symbol_table['mathematica'] dictionary.
The documentation for this function won't be very visible, since it starts
with an underscore, so I was contemplating setting up a mathematica-
specific .sage function that accepts a locals dictionary and has a copy of
this documentation. In the end I didn't do this because I don't
understand the consequences (or why there are separate _sage_ and sage
functions at all). Opinions?
Replying to [comment:6 whuss]:
>On 32-bit Debian I get the same output. There is only one doctest
failure:
>But this is probably unrelated to this patch, since also without this
patch applied I get things like:
Yes, I'm not sure it's related to the patch either. For the record I get
the correct behaviour with the patch:
{{{
sage: mathematica('N[Pi, 1]')
3.1
sage: mathematica('N[Pi, 10]')
3.1415926536
sage: mathematica('N[Pi, 11]')
3.14159265359
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8495#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.