#9583: Unhandled SIGSEGV with 4.5.2.alpha0 on t2
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: drkirkby
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: solaris | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
There is a ticket to create a newer version of Singular - see #8059.
Although it had positive review, and I was marked as the reviewer, I never
gave it positive review - the author did. I particularly asked if it
worked properly on Solaris, but the only evidence presented was that the
package built - not that Sage built, or Sage passed the doctests on
Solaris.
However, if I understand correctly, 4.5.2 is going to be library updates
only, with no updates to .spkg files, so I do not believe an updated
Singular.spkg is likely to be merged in 4.5.2, though it might if the
update is seen as critical. Though changing variable names in one version,
when another version is likely to be merged on the release after this, is
perhaps not a great idea.
Simon, you are correct, 't2' is slow. It's a shame really, as it is very
nice hardware, which is totally unsuited for the task at hand. The CPUs
are designed for a very different task. However, with parallel builds it
is nowhere near as bad as it used to be.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9583#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
