#9607: Doctest failure in latex.rst
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by rbeezer):
* status: new => needs_review
Comment:
Patch marks the test as random, which I think is the right thing to do,
not just an expedient.
There is no way to know what extra packages a system will have, and this
block of code is meant more as an illustration than as a test. So in
particular, the line in question could even be removed, but then there
would be less of the behavior documented.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9607#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
