#9330: Documentation for sha_tate.py not quite looking right
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: cremona
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: elliptic curves | Keywords:
Author: Chris Wuthrich | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Replying to [comment:6 wuthrich]:
> I don't understand this. My file sha_tate.py looks well different from
the documentation link that you give. For instance I have changed the
``descent... thingy in trac 9287 merged as 14603 in 4.5.2.alpha1.
Yes, sorry I didn't see that - I've changed the description. What is up
with the "We get no information the " bit? Maybe this is grammatically
correct in the context of Tate-Shaf groups?
Incidentally, though you changed the references to T-S, the file is S-T :)
Oh well; maybe that's as it should be if there isn't agreement.
> It should always be `Sha` never ``Sha``.
>
> I believe this ticket solves the remaining problems. Though I have not
checked it is needs to be rebased.
Unfortunately I can't check this right now either, but if someone else
doesn't, I'll do so soon.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9330#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
