#9665: Make lcalc accessible as a library on OS X
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by rishi):
Last time I built on 10.5, it worked fine. I do not have access to 10.4
intel machine. I am building it again, but I do not think anything should
change since last time.
Replying to [comment:3 GeorgSWeber]:
> Replying to [comment:1 mpatel]:
> > Sage 4.5.2.rc0 happens to build successfully and pass the long
doctests on bsd.math. Does bsd.math not require a .dylib library?
> >
> > Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with OS X.
>
> The "bsd.math" Mac runs with OS X 10.6 using Apples version of GCC 4.2,
and obviously this one knows how to handle ".so" dynamic libraries in
addition to ".dylib" ones. I suspected so earlier, but since I work almost
exclusively with OS X 10.4 (and thus Apples version of GCC 4.0.1), I
couldn't tell, or know, for sure. So OS X 10.6 is "out of the game" for
the time being.
>
> But how about OS X 10.5 (I think it also still uses GCC 4.0.1)?
> Any results on this platform anybody?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9665#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
