#9670: Bring probability/random_variable.py to 100% coverage
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.3
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* cc: kohel (added)
Comment:
The only thread about this I can find on [http://groups.google.com/group
/sage-
devel/browse_thread/thread/533249e757f61636/00289c1374494e4d?lnk=gst&q=Discrete+probability+space#
sage-devel] seems relevant but short on examples.
There are also some minor bugs in checking for errors, which apparently
have never occurred. There is also some use of multiple inheritance, but
it's not clear why (see
[http://docs.python.org/release/1.5.1p1/tut/multiple.html here] for the
official view on this), although see the above thread for another view.
I'm posting a partial patch, but before I spend more time on this, I'd
like to know if the original author has any comments - particularly as to
what sort of examples were expected with `RandomVariable`, since there
weren't any in the original. Also as to whether the doc upgrades thus far
are on track.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9670#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
