#9224: Unify sage-test and sage-ptest
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:12 mhansen]:
> Quite awhile ago, I had some success with using nose (
http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/ ) to test Sage. I'm not sure if I
still have that code. It might be something to look into since a number
of projects use it for testing.
Sqlalchemy (a standard package in Sage) has a set of self-tests which rely
on 'nose'. I did ask on sage-devel a few weeks back if that should be
included in Sage, but what response I did get was negative.
I'm keen we have more testing of the individual components of Sage. At the
minute, few have spkg-check files, and as I say, at least sqlalchemy will
not work without nose.
#9281 has a list of all the standard packages and whether they have an
spkg-check file. The number is depressing small - about 20% of them.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9224#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
