#9330: Documentation for sha_tate.py not quite looking right
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: cremona
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.5.3
Component: elliptic curves | Keywords:
Author: Chris Wuthrich | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
I figured out how to get my latex in my PATH finally. There are a few
things which *could* be put in ticks or double ticks still, but not ones I
feel are necessary at this point, more ambiguous - and none related to
Sha. Positive review
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9330#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
