#9734: METATICKET Doc test failures on 32-bit Solaris 10 and 32-bit OpenSolaris 
on
x86 CPUs.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  drkirkby  |       Owner:  drkirkby  
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.3
  Component:  solaris   |    Keywords:            
     Author:            |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:            
Work_issues:            |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Description changed by drkirkby:

Old description:

> Although the 32-bit SPARC version of Sage passes all doc tests, there are
> still issues on 32-bit versions of Solaris/!OpenSolaris on x86 hardware.
> This ticket summaries lists only failures on 32-bit builds, versions on
> x86 processors.
>
> 64-bit versions have far more failures, and will need another ticket to
> address them.
>
> ||'''Test'''||'''Solaris 10'''|| '''!OpenSolaris'''||'''Notes'''||
> ||{{{doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
> ||{{{doc/rf/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
> ||{{{sage/lfunctions/sympow.py}}}||#9703||#9703||sympow is also busted on
> cygwin||
> ||{{{sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py}}}||#9703||#9703||sympow ||
> ||{{{sage/modular/abvar/abvar.p}}}||#9703||#9703||sympow||
> ||{{{sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
> ||{{{sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py}}}||    #9703||
> #9703||sympow||
> ||{{{sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
> ||{{{sage/symbolic/expression.pyx}}}||#9689+#9693||#9689+#9693||numerical
> noise and missing zero||
> ||{{{sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx}}}||#9735||#9735||numerical noise||
>
> At this early stage of the 32-bit ports to Solaris 10 and !OpenSolaris on
> x86 processors, it would appear the problems fall into 3 areas
>
>  * Numerical noise.
>  * Sympow on both Solaris 10 and !OpenSolaris
>  * Gfan - only on !OpenSolaris.

New description:

 Although the 32-bit SPARC version of Sage passes all doc tests, there are
 still issues on 32-bit versions of Solaris/!OpenSolaris on x86 hardware.
 This ticket summaries lists only failures on 32-bit builds, versions on
 x86 processors.

 64-bit versions have far more failures, and will need another ticket to
 address them.

 ||'''Test'''||'''Solaris 10'''|| '''!OpenSolaris'''||'''Notes'''||
 ||{{{doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
 ||{{{doc/rf/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs}}}||Passed||#9736||gfan||
 ||{{{sage/lfunctions/sympow.py}}}||#9703||#9703||SYMPOW is also busted on
 Cygwin & !ArchLinux (see #9166)||
 ||{{{sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py}}}||#9703||#9703||SYMPOW||
 ||{{{sage/modular/abvar/abvar.p}}}||#9703||#9703||SYMPOW||
 ||{{{sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py}}}||Passed||#9736||Gfan||
 ||{{{sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py}}}||    #9703||
 #9703||SYMPOW||
 ||{{{sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py}}}||Passed||#9736||Gfan||
 ||{{{sage/symbolic/expression.pyx}}}||#9689+#9693||#9689+#9693||numerical
 noise and missing zero||
 ||{{{sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx}}}||#9735||#9735||numerical noise.
 '''Positive review'''||

 At this early stage of the 32-bit ports to Solaris 10 and !OpenSolaris on
 x86 processors, it would appear the problems fall into 3 areas

  * Numerical noise.
  * [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/lfunctions/sympow.html
 Sympow] on both Solaris 10 and !OpenSolaris.
  * [http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/~jensen/software/gfan/gfan.html Gfan] -
 only on !OpenSolaris.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9734#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to