#9760: Possible numerical noise doctest failure in sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx on t2
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: drkirkby
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.5.3
Component: solaris | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
For the record, I built Sage on a Sun Blade 1000, with 2 GB RAM and two
UltraSPARC III+ processors. Unlike the T2 PLUS CPUs in 't2,math', ATLAS
has the tuning parameters for these older processors, so does not need to
go through the tuning process. Hence I assume (though may be wrong), that
ATLAS will build the say way each time I build it. Anyway, all tests
finally passed.
{{{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 25806.8 seconds
}}}
So I don't think we have introduced any problems - ATLAS probably just had
a bad day on t2!
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9760#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
