#9706: New Version of orthogonal Polynomials
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  maldun           |       Owner:  burcin, maldun                   
       Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  needs_review                     
   Priority:  minor            |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.3                       
  Component:  symbolics        |    Keywords:  orthogonal polynomials, symbolics
     Author:  Stefan Reiterer  |    Upstream:  N/A                              
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:                                   
Work_issues:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by maldun):

 Replying to [comment:23 maldun]:
 > Replying to [comment:22 fredrik.johansson]:
 > > Why is mpmath's precision used by default? Shouldn't the default be RR
 / CC precision? Actually, does _evalf_ ever get called without this
 information?
 > >
 > > Some complex tests would be nice.
 > >
 >
 > This is a good point, and it shouldn't be a problem to change that.
 > But I don't think it's a big deal, because the function takes the
 "parents" precision, which means, if my input is RR it evals it with RR's
 precision.
 >
 > Of course can you call _evalf_ just with (), and then the default value
 is used.
 >
 Ok sorry, wrong explination: when your input are exact data types like ZZ
 ore QQ then the parent has no precision, then you need a default value

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9706#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to