#9894: Group cohomology spkg, version 2.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: SimonKing |
Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: optional packages |
Keywords: modular group cohomology solaris t2
Author: Simon King |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: |
Merged:
Work_issues: Is the code independent of the computer's newline character? |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by SimonKing):
Hi!
Replying to [comment:19 kcrisman]:
> > ...
> > Determining decomposable subspace
> > Extracting decomposable cocycles and relations
Yep. That confirms my conjecture. Right after that line of protocol, there
is a line containing a {{{split}}} statement, and IIRC it originally was
{{{
SelfValues = singular.eval('print(%s)'%DG.name()).split(',\n')
}}}
In the current version, it is
{{{
SelfValues = [t.strip() for t in
singular.eval('print(%s)'%DG.name()).split(',')]
}}}
instead.
Could you test the following, please:
{{{
sage: R = singular.ring(0,'(x,y)','dp')
sage: I = singular.maxideal(3)
sage: singular.eval('print(%s)'%I.name()).split(',\n')
['y^3', 'x*y^2', 'x^2*y', 'x^3']
sage: [t.strip() for t in singular.eval('print(%s)'%I.name()).split(',')]
['y^3', 'x*y^2', 'x^2*y', 'x^3']
}}}
I reckon that on your computer the two lists are different.
Cheers,
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9894#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.