#9221: update matplotlib to 1.0.0 and clean out the patches
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: graphics | Keywords:
Author: Jason Grout | Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers
acknowledge bug.
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:33 kcrisman]:
> Replying to [comment:31 kcrisman]:
> > Replying to [comment:30 jason]:
> > > Okay, I've updated the spkg so that it works on t2 (and passes all
matplotlib tests):
> > >
> > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jason/matplotlib-1.0.0.spkg
> > >
> > > Can people try it?
> >
> > I should be able to try this on OS X 10.4 PPC today or tomorrow.
>
> Seems to be working a-ok here, no issues.
>
> By the way, to drkirkby, looks like matplotlib also uses `nose` to run
their tests, like scipy and numpy. I get no indication that
`SAGE_CHECK=yes` does anything - or would - because of that.
See
#9921
where only today I suggested we make 'nose' a '''standard''' package.
> If we want to test these automatically, we need nose; just adding the
lines to `spkg-check` or `spkg-install` won't help. Obviously this is a
different ticket, but I wanted to point it out. And I'd support adding
this to Sage if it improved things overall.
As far as I can see, adding nose as a stranded package would be very low
risk, as nothing would depend on it except during testing. So it can't
hardly screw Sage up, as long as nose builds reliably itself. Even if it
was totally non-functional, it would not hurt sage.
What we need is a list of packages that use nose, then request it is added
as standard on the basis we can't test otherwise. It might be able to
escape the 'experimental' stage.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9221#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
