#5739: changed from zeta(CDF(1)) go boom! + zeta of 1 return value be consistent
in different rings
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Reporter: was |
Owner: fredrik
Type: defect |
Status: positive_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: number theory |
Keywords:
Author: Mike Hansen, Robert Bradshaw |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman, Robert Bradshaw, David Loeffler |
Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman, Robert Bradshaw => Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Robert Bradshaw, David Loeffler
* author: Mike Hansen => Mike Hansen, Robert Bradshaw
Comment:
OK, that looks fine. I'd still argue that it should be an unsigned
infinity in the real field cases as well, but (as you say) more or less
anything is better than the current behaviour! Let's get this in.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5739#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
