#8333: Finite fields to new coercion model
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: roed | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: algebra | Keywords:
Author: David Roe | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: Depends on broken #8334 |
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by davidloeffler):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: => Depends on broken #8334
Comment:
I've had a look at this, but with mixed success.
Applying {{{8333_parent_init.patch}}} and
{{{8333_finite_fields_to_new_coercion.2.patch}}} to 4.6.alpha1 on top of
the new folded, positively-reviewed patch at #7883, I get one trivial
failure (because I backported a hunk of one of these patches to get #7883
to work). This is fine and can happily be ignored. However, it's very
broken with just those two patches (Sage won't even start up, because of a
broken import statement).
I tried applying all the hunks of {{{7585_12_1_fixes.2.patch}}} other than
the ones involving residue fields. That almost worked, but not quite:
there was still an infinite recursion error occuring in
{{{residue_field.pyx}}}.
David: can you either get this working on its own, or rebase the patches
at #8334 so I can review this and #8334 together?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8333#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
