#9864: Error building PIL on RHEL Server 5.5
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by niles):
Replying to [comment:21 leif]:
> Replying to [comment:19 mpatel]:
> > Georg Weber [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
release/browse_thread/thread/4dbd239d7e9d7b0c/d409f9a25b8891fd#d409f9a25b8891fd
has suggested on sage-release] that we set `SAGE_BINARY_BUILD='yes'` by
default. Thoughts?
>
> As far as I understand this, one has to (manually) copy the build
system's respective shared libraries into {{{$SAGE_LOCAL/lib}}}
(''before'' building PIL) anyhow to make this effective. (Probably some
headers into {{{$SAGE_LOCAL/include}}}, too.) So enabling
{{{SAGE_BINARY_BUILD}}} by default (where?) doesn't make much sense to me.
Maybe, as with [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html
SAGE_PIL_NOTK], sage should set `SAGE_BINARY_BUILD='yes'` if building PIL
fails.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9864#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
