#4446: New module complex_mpc using lib mpc for complex multiprecision
arithmetic
-----------------------------------------------------------------+----------
Reporter: thevenyp | Owner:
mabshoff
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-4.6
Component: basic arithmetic | Keywords:
Author: Philippe Theveny, Alex Ghitza, Yann Laigle-Chapuy | Upstream:
N/A
Reviewer: William Stein, David Kirkby, Paul Zimmermann | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------------------------------------+----------
Changes (by mpatel):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:50 ylchapuy]:
> * I made a self contained patch rebased on sage 4.5.2.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/4446/trac4446
-optional_mpc-sage4.5.2based.patch
> * An spkg is still available at
http://yann.laiglechapuy.net/spkg/mpc-0.8.3-dev-svn793.spkg
> * this is intended to make `mpc` an '''optional''' spkg. The
`complex_mpc` module won't be compiled if the spkg is not installed.
After applying the patch but not installing the optional package, I get
{{{
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/complex_mpc.pyx # 454
doctests failed
}}}
Should all of the tests in `complex_mpc.pyx` be tagged with `#optional -
mpc` (see [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#further-
conventions-for-automated-testing-of-examples this section of the
developer guide])? (I don't know if there's a easier way.) Or am I
mistaken?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4446#comment:54>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
