#9822: Sage only examines the last cookie for a username
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: timdumol | Owner: jason, was
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: notebook | Keywords:
Author: Jason Grout | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mpatel):
Replying to [comment:22 kcrisman]:
> > But I can't work on this now, as I'm a bit busy with getting
4.6.alpha2 ready to release and working on #3524. That will put the 4.6
cycle in feature freeze, so it's likely that the new Cython, !NumPy,
Pynac, SageNB, and !SciPy packages will have to wait for 4.6.1.
>
> Not to reopen the whole numbering issue, but it seems weird that major
upgrades to big pieces of Sage would be 4.6.1 - and possibly wait weeks.
Is it possible to keep the 4.6 cycle going, or would it make more sense to
wait on all these? I realize you're doing the work - just a query.
(Partly this is the fear that 4.6.1 might not happen for a while, since I
expect you to take a break after this release! You certainly deserve it.)
Thanks! I may well take a break after 4.6 is out.
I'll try to reply soon on sage-devel about the possibility of waiting
longer for 4.6.alpha2 or adding an alpha3.
Right now, I need to investigate a potential problem with current trial
alpha2. The current merge script is
[http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.6.alpha2/merger-4.6.alpha2
here].
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9822#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.