#10072: Bug in log gamma evaluation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  kcrisman          |       Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:            
     Author:                    |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Old description:

> However `log_gamma` is numerically evaluated, it seems to be wrong (or on
> another branch?)
> {{{
> sage: log_gamma(i).n()
> -0.0219785471672303 - 0.168184318273662*I
> sage: log_gamma(pari(i))
> -0.650923199301856 - 1.87243664726243*I
> }}}
> And in Sage's Maxima:
> {{{
> (%i3) ev(log_gamma(%i),numer);
> (%o3)             - 1.872436647262428 %i - .6509231993018556
> }}}
> The relevant bit of code is
> {{{
> sage: a = log_gamma(i)
> sage: a._convert(RealField(53).complex_field())
> -0.0219785471672303 - 0.168184318273662*I
> }}}
> But I'm not sure if this problem is in Pynac or in !RealField.

New description:

 When `log_gamma` is naively numerically evaluated, it seems to be wrong.
 {{{
 sage: log_gamma(i).n()
 -0.0219785471672303 - 0.168184318273662*I
 }}}
 Pari gives this:
 {{{
 sage: log_gamma(pari(i))
 -0.650923199301856 - 1.87243664726243*I
 }}}
 And in Sage's Maxima:
 {{{
 (%i3) ev(log_gamma(%i),numer);
 (%o3)             - 1.872436647262428 %i - .6509231993018556
 }}}
 And in ginsh for Ginac 1.5.8:
 {{{
 > lgamma(I);
 -0.65092319930185634056+4.41074865991715666*I
 }}}
 which is pretty clearly a different branch choice from Maxima and Pari
 (the complex part is exactly `2*pi` away from Maxima and Pari).

 The relevant bit of code is
 {{{
 sage: a = log_gamma(i)
 sage: a._convert(RealField(53).complex_field())
 -0.0219785471672303 - 0.168184318273662*I
 }}}
 But I'm not sure if this problem is in Pynac or in the Sage complex field.

--

Comment(by kcrisman):

 More mysterious (after MUCH trouble trying to get Ginac to compile on OS X
 - needed to install CLN, pkg-config, and readline!!!):
 {{{
 ginsh - GiNaC Interactive Shell (ginac V1.5.8)
   __,  _______  Copyright (C) 1999-2010 Johannes Gutenberg University
 Mainz,
  (__) *       | Germany.  This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO
 WARRANTY.
   ._) i N a C | You are welcome to redistribute it under certain
 conditions.
 <-------------' For details type `warranty;'.

 Type ?? for a list of help topics.
 > lgamma(I);
 -0.65092319930185634056+4.41074865991715666*I
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10072#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to