#8442: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics (tutorial)
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: bump | Owner: bump
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: Daniel Bump | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Minh Van Nguyen, Mark Jordan | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Changes (by jhpalmieri):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
This looks like an amazing document to include with Sage. Thanks for
working on it.
First, all doctests pass for me.
I get three warnings when building the docs, two of which anyone can fix:
{{{
/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/lie/weyl_character_ring.rst:397:
(WARNING/2) Title underline too short.
Integration
-------
/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/lie/weyl_character_ring.rst:397:
(WARNING/2) Title underline too short.
Integration
-------
}}}
The third one I think Dan has to do:
{{{
/Applications/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/lie/weyl_groups.rst::
WARNING: citation not found: BumpNakasuji2010
}}}
A few questions and comments about the text: first, the style in the Sage
documentation is to use {{{\Bold{C}}}} for the complex numbers, and
similarly for R and Q. This is more of an issue for docstrings for
methods, functions, etc., but you might consider changing it.
In introduction.rst,
{{{
For example, we could take `G = SU(n)`,
`\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{sl}(n, \mathbb{R})`,
`\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbb{C}} = \mathfrak{sl}(n, \mathbb{C})` and
`G = SL(n, \mathbb{C})`.
}}}
Should the last "G" be "G_{\mathbb{C}}" (or "G_{\Bold{C}}")?
In lie_basics.rst, on line 141: {{{However Parabolic subgroups do not
exist for compact Lie groups.}}} Don't capitalize "Parabolic".
On line 150:
{{{
Such a type is implemented in Sage as a pair ``[`X`,r]``
}}}
I would use plain quotes around the X, not backquotes: {{{``['X',r]``}}}
A few lines later:
{{{
The exceptional types are::
['G',2], ['F',4], ['E',6], ['E',7] or ['E',8].
}}}
The indented block is verbatim text, so spacing matters. The
inconsistency between double-spacing and single-spacing looks odd to me,
and I would just put single spaces after all of the commas.
weyl_character_ring.rst, line 239, {{{with Cartan type `['B',r]`}}}: I
would use double back quotes here instead of single ones.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8442#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.