#9382: atlas not respecting SAGE_FAT_BINARY on i686 systems
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mariah | Owner: Mariah Lenox
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: Mariah Lenox | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by ddrake):
A similar problem has been noticed in Arch Linux:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21592
{{{
18:44 < td123> hello
18:45 < td123> it seems that when building sage, it doesn't respect the
SAGE_FAT_BINARY='yes' option because I built sage with that
option on a corei7 for x86 and someone kept getting illegal
instruction on a pentium 3
18:45 < td123> when I looked through the logs, it seemed that atlas (among
possibly others) were building with processort specific
optimizations
18:48 < td123> I'm the packager for archlinux :)
http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/sage-mathematics/trunk/PKGBUILD
is
the package source
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9382#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
