#10248: Correct the "Inclusion Procedure for New Packages" section in Developers
Guide
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: David Kirkby | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by drkirkby):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 dimpase]:
> I would be more careful in explaining the license question, as it
regularly pops up on sage-devel.
> What is currently written, or what is in proposed changes, can be easily
misread as "code must be under GPLv2, or code must be under GPLv2 or later
GPL version). Is there a canonical reference/link on this to be included?
>
> Dima
Yes, I agree with you. I've raised the issue on sage-devel. Once there's
some agreement about the wording, I'll add that. I think it's a
sufficiently important point it needs discussion there, rather than just
on this trac ticket.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10248#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
