#8800: Doctest coverage of categories - numerous coercion fixes
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: Simon King
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: categories | Keywords: categories doctests
Author: Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Hi John,
Replying to [comment:53 cremona]:
> I just tested on a different 32-bit machine on which I have just built
4.6.1.alpha3 (and all tests passed): Same failure as before for
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py, and for
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
>
> The second one of these is the more worrying in that it goes into an
infinite recursion.
I wonder if the recursion comes from the testing framework. Once, I
observed such recursion in a test, but I could not reproduce it in an
interactive session. In addition, I got a return value different from the
expected - and when I changed the expected value in the test, the
recursion disappeared as well.
Could you change the expected 32-bit value in the test of selmer_group to
the value that you get in an interactive session, and then try `sage -t
"sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py"` again?
Cheers,
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8800#comment:54>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
