#8442: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics (tutorial)
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
   Reporter:  bump                          |       Owner:  bump      
       Type:  enhancement                   |      Status:  needs_info
   Priority:  major                         |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1
  Component:  documentation                 |    Keywords:            
     Author:  Daniel Bump                   |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  Minh Van Nguyen, Mark Jordan  |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                                |  
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:45 bump]:


 > > It would also be good if anything is said regarding the optional Sage
 package lie (by Marc van Leeuween). Is it right that basically anything
 doable in lie can be done in Sage? In particular, lie can compute
 decompositions of, say, a tensor product of two representations into
 irreducibles. It's not clear to me whether one can do this in Sage
 (without lie).
 >
 > I am not sure whether everything that is doable with LiE is doable with
 Sage but I do think that anything that is needed from LiE is either in
 Sage already or (if needed) should be reimplemented. What is in Sage is a
 pretty complete toolkit for finite-dimensional representations of Lie
 groups. Decomposing a tensor product into irreducibles is just the
 multiplication in the WeylCharacterRing. This is addressed in the
 tutorial. See:
 >
 > http://match.stanford.edu/bump/thematic_tutorials-
 js/lie/weyl_character_ring.html#tensor-products-of-representations


 One particular thing I was able to do using Lie was to compute things in
 classical invariant theory, such as the dimension of the space of
 invariants of degree k
 of the m-ary form of degree d (for fixed k,m,d). Basically, that meant
 computing certain symmetric power of certain representation of GL_m (or
 SL_m), and finding out whether there was a 1-dimensional sub-
 representation.

 Is this doable in Sage?
 Thanks!

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8442#comment:46>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to