#10483: Deprecate the misuse of symbolic variables as polynomial variable
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  SimonKing            |       Owner:  AlexGhitza                   
           
       Type:  defect               |      Status:  needs_review                 
           
   Priority:  major                |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1                   
           
  Component:  basic arithmetic     |    Keywords:  deprecation symbolic 
polynomial variable
     Author:  Simon King           |    Upstream:  N/A                          
           
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman  |      Merged:                               
           
Work_issues:                       |  
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 Replying to [comment:5 SimonKing]:
 > Replying to [comment:4 kcrisman]:
 > > So maybe you could say
 > > {{{
 > > ... resulting polynomial ring.  However, this was not the case; the
 generator of a polynomial ring is always a polynomial type, not a symbolic
 expression, so although they have the same representation, they are not
 the same.  This explains the following warning:
 > >
 > > <deprecation warning doctest
 > > }}}
 > > Does that make any sense?
 >
 > Yes, your formulation sounds much better than mine! Could you make a
 reviewer patch, changing the formulation?
 >

 Umm... that might not happen for a little while.   I can do it, though.
 But if I'm going to give it a formal review, I have to make sure I check
 that all those changes involving making things strings really catch what
 they are supposed to, and I don't have time to do that right now, and then
 make the reviewer patch, and I am slow on such things... sorry.

 Also, I seem to recall there being some discussion about this on sage-
 devel.  It's enough of a change (particularly since there are doctests
 which use the old one) that it could inconvenience some heavy users to see
 the deprecation messages, so if you have a link to that discussion I'd be
 interested in reading through it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10483#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to