#10603: DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets should not always define Element and
_element_constructor_
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.2
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets
Element
Author: Florent Hivert | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Nicolas ThiƩry | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
When the argument {{{facade}}} is set to {{{True}}} the attributes
{{{Element}}} and {{{_element_constructor_}}} are defined by the class
{{{DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets}}}. This is a bad idea because it prevents
a super class like a category to define them. The following patch fixes
this problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10603>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.