#10603: DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets should not always define Element and
_element_constructor_
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  hivert          |       Owner:  sage-combinat                     
 
       Type:  defect          |      Status:  new                               
 
   Priority:  major           |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.2                        
 
  Component:  combinatorics   |    Keywords:  DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets 
Element
     Author:  Florent Hivert  |    Upstream:  N/A                               
 
   Reviewer:  Nicolas ThiƩry  |      Merged:                                    
 
Work_issues:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 When the argument {{{facade}}} is set to {{{True}}} the attributes
 {{{Element}}} and {{{_element_constructor_}}} are defined by the class
 {{{DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets}}}. This is a bad idea because it prevents
 a super class like a category to define them. The following patch fixes
 this problem.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10603>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to