#7981: animate ignores options to show that are passed up from the plot command
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
   Reporter:  jason                                             |       Owner:  
novoselt    
       Type:  defect                                            |      Status:  
needs_review
   Priority:  major                                             |   Milestone:  
sage-4.6.2  
  Component:  graphics                                          |    Keywords:  
            
     Author:  Jason Grout, Andrey Novoseltsev                   |    Upstream:  
N/A         
   Reviewer:  Tim Dumol, Marshall Hampton, Karl-Dieter Crisman  |      Merged:  
            
Work_issues:                                                    |  
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Hmm, but in many places in this file it says why such things are optional.
 In fact, ''earlier in the same docstring'' the first occurrence of
 `.show()` explains this:
 {{{
         sage: a.show()          # optional -- requires convert command
 }}}
 as well as several lines later
 {{{
         sage: a.show() # optional -- requires convert command
 }}}
 so hopefully one wouldn't need to do it a third time in three paragraphs.
 Especially since it's a `TEST`.

 Also, the actual issue with creating a file I have posted to sage-devel
 about; it's not 100% clear to me that this is a bug.  It just happened to
 have a bad effect here, which I changed from Andrey's patch.  But it's
 orthogonal to the ticket.

 So putting back to 'needs review'.  I hope you will agree with me that
 this is in fact still worthy of positive review.

 Now, of course there is in the doctesting framework the issue that one can
 do optional tests with only certain keywords, so if one has `convert` one
 could run them with that keyword.  But in that case, the entire file
 `animate.py` is replete with violations of this, and I feel that should be
 a separate ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7981#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to