#10143: Bring 2D plotting up to 100% doctest coverage (except plot.py)
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
   Reporter:  kcrisman                          |       Owner:  mvngu          
       Type:  enhancement                       |      Status:  positive_review
   Priority:  minor                             |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.2     
  Component:  documentation                     |    Keywords:                 
     Author:  Karl-Dieter Crisman               |    Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:  Minh Van Nguyen, Geoffrey Ehrman  |      Merged:                 
Work_issues:                                    |  
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------

Old description:

> There are a few functions missing doctesting in sage/plot that aren't in
> plot3d/.  Fixing this is the subject of this ticket.  Doing it for
> plot.py largely is about !GraphicsArray objects, so that is a separate
> ticket - #10144.
>
> With the patches below, the rebuilt reference manual can be found at
>
> http://mvngu.googlecode.com/hg/10143-plot/index.html
>
> '''Apply:'''
>
>  1. [attachment:trac_10143-2dplotcoverage.patch]
>  1. [attachment:trac-10143_reviewer.patch]

New description:

 There are a few functions missing doctesting in sage/plot that aren't in
 plot3d/.  Fixing this is the subject of this ticket.  Doing it for plot.py
 largely is about !GraphicsArray objects, so that is a separate ticket -
 #10144.

 With the patches below, the rebuilt reference manual can be found at

 http://mvngu.googlecode.com/hg/10143-plot/index.html

 '''Apply:'''

  1. [attachment:trac_10143-2dplotcoverage.patch]
  1. [attachment:trac-10143_reviewer.patch]

 '''Dependencies:''' #7981, #8632, #10244

--

Comment(by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:15 novoselt]:
 > The first of the current dependencies is closed, the second, I believe,
 is a mistake and should have been #8632, which is a prerequisite for
 #10244. So it seems that I can just say
 >
 > Depends on #10244

 Well, specifiying '''all''' dependencies is much more useful actually.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10143#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to