#9433: Put more files under revision control.
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
   Reporter:  jhpalmieri                    |       Owner:  tbd         
       Type:  enhancement                   |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major                         |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.2  
  Component:  distribution                  |    Keywords:              
     Author:  John Palmieri                 |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Leif Leonhardy, Volker Braun  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                                |  
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Changes (by vbraun):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:88 jdemeyer]:
 > Why do we need a {{{sage_root.spkg}}}?  I don't see a reason for a "root
 repo" to ever exist in tarball form.

 The way things are set up right now, if you upgrade an existing sage
 installation then the updated `SAGE_ROOT_REPO` will merge updates to the
 `$SAGE_ROOT` repository. As long as we don't have an official online
 repository to pull changes from I don't see any better way to do the
 upgrade. Am I missing something?

 I agree that we need to disentangle the `sage_root` repository more from
 `sage_scripts`. Basically, everything that `sage_scripts/spkg-install`
 manually copies into `$SAGE_ROOT` should be part of the root repo, like
 `README.txt`. But I think this can wait until we actually do have a
 `sage_root` repository. Then it'll be easy to write complimentary patches
 for the two repositories that clean this up.

 I'm also totally in favour of merging the spkg/base repo. Since that has
 only 26 log entries (with the most recent one from July), I think we can
 live without preserving its history. Right now we don't use this
 repository during upgrades as far as I know.

 If you agree with this then I'll make a followup ticket...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9433#comment:92>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to