#10668: Refactor category support for morphisms (Hom is not a functorial
construction!)
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: categories | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:13 SimonKing]:
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to build upon #10667. There,
amongst other things, I try to separate `CategoryObject` from `SageObject`
and remove some inappropriate category stuff from elements and morphisms.
I think that this part of #10667 could help me to implement my approach.
>
> I suggest that ''I'' prepare my patch on top of #10667; you can of
course do differently with the implementation of your approach.
Sure, please take the easiest route for you! #10667 is already large
enough, and I see the point of not introducing yet another dependency :-)
Cheers,
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10668#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
