#4492: block_matrix reacts inconsistently with 0
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jbmohler | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.2
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Author: Willem Jan Palenstijn | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Aly Deines, Rob Beezer | Merged:
Work_issues: rebase |
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by rbeezer):
* cc: davidloeffler (added)
Comment:
Rebased patches apply fine and Sage builds.
However 3 doctests fail. These can be traced to #10433 that snuck into
4.6.2.alpha1 while this was in-progress. ;-) Specifically one 2x2 block
matrix built at line 2366 of
`sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py`
Latest patch rearranges the block matrix construction to meet new
requirements for more explicit lists for the block matrix. I've cc'ed
David Loeffler if he wants to check off on just that one change. Passes
all tests now in sage/rings. All work here is on 4.6.2.alpha1.
Would somebody like to retest the whole package now?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4492#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
