#10739: Singular fails to build on OSX with 64bit kernel
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.2
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: Volker Braun | Upstream: Workaround found; Bug reported
upstream.
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by saliola):
Replying to [comment:8 vbraun]:
> just put the new singular spkg in `$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard`.
I did exactly this. It compiled without a problem. However, there was a
doctest failure when I ran {{{make ptest}}}:
{{{
sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py"
**********************************************************************
File
"/Users/saliola/sage-4.6.2.alpha3-trac10739/devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py",
line 668:
sage: G.random_element()
Expected:
[2 1 1 1]
[1 0 2 1]
[0 1 1 0]
[1 0 0 1]
Got:
[0 1 1 0]
[1 2 2 2]
[1 1 1 0]
[2 0 1 2]
**********************************************************************
File
"/Users/saliola/sage-4.6.2.alpha3-trac10739/devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py",
line 679:
sage: G.random_element()
Expected:
[1 3]
[0 3]
Got:
[4 2]
[1 0]
**********************************************************************
File
"/Users/saliola/sage-4.6.2.alpha3-trac10739/devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py",
line 682:
sage: G.random_element()
Expected:
[2 2]
[1 0]
Got:
[4 1]
[0 2]
**********************************************************************
File
"/Users/saliola/sage-4.6.2.alpha3-trac10739/devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py",
line 685:
sage: G.random_element()
Expected:
[4 0]
[1 4]
Got:
[2 4]
[2 3]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
4 of 10 in __main__.example_22
***Test Failed*** 4 failures.
}}}
Interestingly, this is precisely the same error (including the same
output) as in #9310. Note that I now have two independent builds of
sage-4.6.2.alpha3 on my machine, one in which this test passes and the
other in which it fails.
Anyhow, I think this doctest failure is unrelated. Your fix works
perfectly, so I am willing to give it a positive review provided that you
agree that the above failure is unrelated.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10739#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
