#10784: primes can have better functionallity.
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mderickx | Owner: tbd
Type: PLEASE CHANGE | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
In this topic:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
devel/browse_thread/thread/cd05585cf395b3a0/c7c82fbb725dee50
D.S. McNeil posted several ideas for enhancing sage. This ticket is for
the enhancements proposed for the primes function.
{{{
(3) primes(10, infinity) should work.
Since we're just calling next_prime, there's no reason to require the
upper limit to be an integer.
Wouldn't mind a proof=False option which calls next_probable_prime
instead, either.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10784>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
