#10906: lazy import can break unique representation
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  nthiery  |       Owner:  jason                             
       Type:  defect   |      Status:  new                               
   Priority:  major    |   Milestone:                                    
  Component:  misc     |    Keywords:  lazy import, unique representation
     Author:           |    Upstream:  N/A                               
   Reviewer:           |      Merged:                                    
Work_issues:           |  
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by robertwb):

 Good point about categories. As for printing them out like that would make
 them very unfriendly for top-level use. I could see this being a useful
 flag to set for debugging though (and for a slew of other objects, so we'd
 have "Gap(1)" and "Pari(1)" and "Maxima(1)" instead of just "1" for all of
 them.

 For our sanity, I could see rejecting lazy import objects for category
 bases. It may also make sense to not delegate equality (and hashcode)
 operations.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10906#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to