#10938: Add subset and superset methods to Sage's finite sets
(Set_object_enumerated)
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  nthiery            |       Owner:  sage-combinat
       Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major              |   Milestone:  sage-4.7     
  Component:  combinatorics      |    Keywords:               
     Author:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |    Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:                     |      Merged:               
Work_issues:                     |  
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by nthiery):

 Hi Andrei,

 Replying to [comment:3 novoselt]:
 > Would it be acceptable to have both options?

 You are welcome to raise the question on sage-devel. However, that
 risks to be a source of confusion in the long run. Typically, a
 specific sage set might forget to override both issubset and is_subset
 when implementing e.g. a faster method for testing containment. In any
 cases,
 I would tend to leave that to a subsequent patch.

 > It would be nice also to have a better Hg-comment in the patch ;-)

 Oops, fixed. Thanks!

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10938#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to