#10938: Add subset and superset methods to Sage's finite sets
(Set_object_enumerated)
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: combinatorics | Keywords:
Author: Nicolas M. ThiƩry | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by nthiery):
Hi Andrei,
Replying to [comment:3 novoselt]:
> Would it be acceptable to have both options?
You are welcome to raise the question on sage-devel. However, that
risks to be a source of confusion in the long run. Typically, a
specific sage set might forget to override both issubset and is_subset
when implementing e.g. a faster method for testing containment. In any
cases,
I would tend to leave that to a subsequent patch.
> It would be nice also to have a better Hg-comment in the patch ;-)
Oops, fixed. Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10938#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.