#9976: Decorated functions/methods have generic signature in documentation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jsrn              |       Owner:  jsrn                            
        
       Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  needs_review                    
        
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.7                        
        
  Component:  documentation     |    Keywords:  sphinx, documentation, cython 
inspection
     Author:  jsrn, Simon King  |    Upstream:  N/A                             
        
   Reviewer:  Simon King        |      Merged:                                  
        
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:130 jhpalmieri]:
 > It's missing '''from the reference manual''': I put this code at the
 bottom of sage/misc/latex.py (just to pick a file at random from among
 those included in the reference manual), ran "sage -b", and rebuilt the
 documentation.  The manual had test1 in it, but not test3.

 Really? That's odd.

 > I feel like this is a serious problem with decorated functions (or at
 least cached functions) and the reference manual: we shouldn't have to
 sacrifice quality and completeness of documentation to get better
 performance by caching things.

 Perhaps you confuse the purpose of the two tickets: Here, we have the
 purpose of getting the documentation of cached methods right, which also
 involves to broaden the capability of sage.misc.sageinspect -- it is not
 about performance at all. #11115 is about performance, but it should
 certainly not affect the documentation.

 So, if a cached function really is not included into the references then
 that is a bug and should be addressed here. I'll be able to do some tests
 tomorrow.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9976#comment:132>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to