#11225: improve piecewise plotting
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: jason, was
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: graphics | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Description changed by kcrisman:
Old description:
> Until we actual totally rewrite piecewise functions, we should improve
> some things.
>
> For concreteness, here is one thing that should work but doesn't. I'm
> sure there are more - add to this list, and then whatever isn't fixed in
> this ticket can be moved to another ticket. I just want to make sure
> they're listed in one place, not ten tickets.
> * plotting more than one
> {{{
> sage: f = Piecewise([[(0,1),x^3], [(1,2),x^2]], x)
> sage: plot([f,x^3],(x,0,2))
> }}}
New description:
Until we actually totally rewrite piecewise functions, we should improve
some things.
For concreteness, here is one thing that should work but doesn't. I'm sure
there are more - add to this list, and then whatever isn't fixed in this
ticket can be moved to another ticket. I just want to make sure they're
listed in one place, not ten tickets.
List:
* plotting more than one
{{{
sage: f = Piecewise([[(0,1),x^3], [(1,2),x^2]], x)
sage: plot([f,x^3],(x,0,2))
}}}
* Maybe unify with `plot_step_function`, which currently is sort of its
own thing?
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11225#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
