#10760: Improve coverage test for gsl/interpolation.pyx
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: demengeo | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: misc | Keywords:
Author: O. Demengeon | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
These are good, I think, in general. Before a thorough look, can you
also put some indirect tests in? Usually in Sage documentation
{{{__getitem__}}} and friends are tested via slicing, I think. In any
case, this would help anyone who comes upon this and is wondering what
those things do. The format is then
{{{
sage: test[i] # indirect doctest
}}}
or something like this. We do this for a number of underscore tests,
though I don't think this is in the developer guide or anything.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10760#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
