#11230: Define our own PariOUT
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jdemeyer         |          Owner:  was            
       Type:  enhancement      |         Status:  positive_review
   Priority:  minor            |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1     
  Component:  interfaces       |       Keywords:  pari           
Work_issues:                   |       Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:  Robert Bradshaw  |         Author:  Jeroen Demeyer 
     Merged:                   |   Dependencies:                 
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

  * reviewer:  => Robert Bradshaw


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:2 robertwb]:
 > LGTM, pending adding the trac number to the ticket description.
 This is no longer necessary (see [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 devel/browse_thread/thread/f5a9c012f6299a9e/a3c2af4a7700bca3])

 > Why in the world did we define {{{__x}}} to do {{{ctypedef __x
 pariout_t}}}?
 I didn't write that code, but probably to work around some limitation/bug
 in an earlier version of Cython?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11230#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to