#10859: Add is_series() method and others to symbolic expressions
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  vbraun               |          Owner:  burcin      
       Type:  enhancement          |         Status:  needs_work  
   Priority:  major                |      Milestone:  sage-4.7    
  Component:  symbolics            |       Keywords:              
Work_issues:                       |       Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman  |         Author:  Volker Braun
     Merged:                       |   Dependencies:              
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * reviewer:  => Karl-Dieter Crisman


Comment:

 A few comments/questions:
  * Are there any other symbolic objects that would look like series but
 not be caught by this?  (For instance, ones gotten by doing {{{SR(some
 Maxima thing that returns a series)}}}.)  I guess I'm wondering if this is
 only supposed to find things created by `.series()` or if it's supposed to
 catch anything that's a series.
  * Does this include Laurent series?
  * There are a couple weird typos, including {{{via the :meth:`series`
 method.a }}}
  * The {{{Boolean. Whether ``self`` was constructed by :meth:`series`.}}}
 should look more like it does for other outputs, or at least have a
 semicolon or colon or something for both of these functions.
  * I think that the second patch should be part of a separate ticket.
 Presumably someone thought it was good for the methods to be hidden, so it
 would be helpful to know why that is.
  * Should we maybe even discuss whether these new methods should be
 underscored?

 I apologize for not having time to give this a proper review, though on a
 cursory examination it looks fine in terms of the actual code and tests.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10859#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to