#9880: Segfault in PyNaC 0.2.0.p4
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jpflori    |          Owner:  burcin    
       Type:  defect     |         Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major      |      Milestone:  sage-4.7  
  Component:  symbolics  |       Keywords:  pynac     
Work_issues:             |       Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:             |         Author:            
     Merged:             |   Dependencies:            
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by burcin):

 Please excuse my ignorance, especially since I promised to make a pynac
 release which includes this patch ages ago, but I have a few questions and
 not enough time to test this and find out the answers on my own:

  * doesn't this require a patch to the Sage library at least to fix
 doctests? Is the new printing order exactly the same as the old
 (inconsistent) one?

  * Don't we also need to modify the operand access functions (at least the
 one in Sage - not the .op() function of ginac) to return the operands in
 the sorted order, not the stored (somewhat random) order?


 BTW, Jean-Pierre, I wouldn't mind at all if you want to cut the new pynac
 release yourself. I can provide instructions on how to do this.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9880#comment:36>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to