#11352: is_polynomial returns wrong results
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  hivert     |          Owner:  burcin                              
      
       Type:  defect     |         Status:  needs_info                          
      
   Priority:  major      |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1                          
      
  Component:  symbolics  |       Keywords:  is_polynomial                       
      
Work_issues:             |       Upstream:  Fixed upstream, in a later stable 
release.
   Reviewer:             |         Author:                                      
      
     Merged:             |   Dependencies:                                      
      
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by hivert):

 From the Ginac mailing list:
 {{{
 Hi everybody,

 GiNaC 1.6.0 is out and available. You can find the changes at the end
 of this email.

 Note:
 This release is not binary compatible to the previous one.
 Also, we changed the name of the library filename from libginac-1.5 to
 libginac. The ABI versioning is now done in recommended libtool
 manner. The dynamic library will be created as libginac.so.2.0.0 this
 time.
 We also stopped to create extra branches in the repository for ABI
 compatible versions. The latest releases will from now on always be in
 master.

 Changes:
 [...]
 * Fixed a bug in is_polynomial().
 [...]
 }}}
 So we now "only" need to upgrade ginac.

 There is no "fixed upstream and released" tag... I'm not sure if the
 current tag is correct.
 Florent

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11352#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to