#8896: 0.0000000000000000000000000000 is parsed completely differently than
1.0000000000000000000000000000 for no good reason
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  was               |          Owner:  AlexGhitza     
       Type:  defect            |         Status:  needs_info     
   Priority:  minor             |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1     
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |       Keywords:                 
Work_issues:                    |       Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:  Mariah Lenox      |         Author:  Robert Bradshaw
     Merged:                    |   Dependencies:                 
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by robertwb):

 Replying to [comment:25 jdemeyer]:
 > In my opinion, this ticket is a huge can of worms and a bad idea.  I
 don't see any mathematically consistent reason who 0.0 '''should''' be
 treated differently than 0.0000000000000.

 It's exactly the same reason that 1.0 is treated differently than
 1.0000000000000000000000. The (value-preserving) trailing zeros indicate
 higher precision.

 > I really think the current behaviour of Sage is what makes the most
 sense (mathematically) so I am not in favour of this ticket.  Of course,
 if the majority thinks this patch is a good idea then I'm all for it.
 >
 > One thing about the patch which is very unclear is why zero is treated
 differently from other numbers.

 Because otherwise there's now way to write a high-precision zero (in fact
 I can't think of any other interpretation of a large number of trailing
 zeros).

 > Consider::
 > {{{
 > sage: (0.0).prec()
 > 53
 > sage: (0.1).prec()
 > 53
 > sage: (000000000000000000000.0).prec()
 > 77
 > sage: (000000000000000000000.1).prec()
 > 53
 > sage: (0.000000000000000000000).prec()
 > 77
 > sage: (0.000000000000000000001).prec()
 > 53
 > }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8896#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to