#10335: Add domains for permutation groups
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  mhansen        |          Owner:  joyner      
       Type:  enhancement    |         Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major          |      Milestone:  sage-5.0    
  Component:  group theory   |       Keywords:              
Work_issues:                 |       Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Robert Miller  |         Author:  Mike Hansen 
     Merged:                 |   Dependencies:  #10334      
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Comment(by nborie):

 I was very close to set a positive review for this patch but I got this
 faillure :
 {{{
 nicolas@lancelot:/opt/sage/devel/sage-combinat$ sage -t
 sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
 sage -t  "devel/sage-combinat/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py"
 **********************************************************************
 File "/opt/sage/devel/sage-combinat/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py",
 line 2550:
     sage: G.isomorphism_to(H)
 Expected:
     Permutation group morphism:
       From: Permutation Group with generators [(2,3), (1,2,3)]
       To:   Permutation Group with generators [(1,2,4), (1,4)]
       Defn: [(2,3), (1,2,3)] -> [(2,4), (1,2,4)]
 Got:
     Permutation group morphism:
       From: Permutation Group with generators [(2,3), (1,2,3)]
       To:   Permutation Group with generators [(1,2,4), (1,4)]
       Defn: [(2,3), (1,2,3)] -> [(2,4), (1,4,2)]
 **********************************************************************
 1 items had failures:
    1 of   9 in __main__.example_73
 }}}
 Is this a random test ? Is this test really unrandonized (sorry for such a
 word) ?
 I am running a 11.4 Ubuntu up to date on a macbook santa rosa 4,1. I got
 this faillure both using the sage combinat queue and a separate branch
 with only 10334 and 10335.

 Also, in sage/groups/perm-gps/permgroup.py line 1119, there is still the
 micro typo :
 postition --> position

 Anyway, It is a very very nice work and improvement of permutation groups.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10335#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to