#8345: cannot convert symbolic functions back from maxima
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: burcin | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: interfaces | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Author: Burcin Erocal
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Old description:
> From sage-devel:
>
> {{{
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:02:21 -0800 (PST)
> Håkan Granath <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Typesetting conjugates of variables (that has been passed to
> > Maxima and back?) is strange. In e.g. Sage 4.2 this did not
> > happen.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Sage Version 4.3.3, Release Date: 2010-02-21 |
> > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > sage: assume(x,'complex')
> > sage: latex(x.conjugate())
> > \overline{x}
> > sage: latex(x.conjugate().factor())
> > {\rm conjugate}\left(x\right)
> }}}
>
> Somehow we don't recognize the conjugate function in the string we get
> back from maxima, and create a new one. The last line above is the
> default latex typesetting for symbolic functions.
>
> The thread is here:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/cd43a14bee6e9be
New description:
From sage-devel:
{{{
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Håkan Granath <[email protected]> wrote:
> Typesetting conjugates of variables (that has been passed to
> Maxima and back?) is strange. In e.g. Sage 4.2 this did not
> happen.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Sage Version 4.3.3, Release Date: 2010-02-21 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> sage: assume(x,'complex')
> sage: latex(x.conjugate())
> \overline{x}
> sage: latex(x.conjugate().factor())
> {\rm conjugate}\left(x\right)
}}}
Somehow we don't recognize the conjugate function in the string we get
back from maxima, and create a new one. The last line above is the default
latex typesetting for symbolic functions.
The thread is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/cd43a14bee6e9be
----
Apply [attachment:trac_8345-doctest.patch].
--
Comment:
Okay, thanks - and thanks for the tip, in the last few months I've finally
started using queues.
I already tried several things yesterday, so all is well. Positive
review.
Incidentally, this has been fixed for a ''while'':
{{{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 4.4.4, Release Date: 2010-06-23 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading Sage library. Current Mercurial branch is: hackbranch
sage: assume(x,'complex')
sage: latex(x.conjugate().simplify())
\overline{x}
sage:
}}}
----
Apply [attachment:trac_8345-doctest.patch].
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8345#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
