#11324: Bug in gale_ryser_theorem
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: wdj
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work_issues:
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer: Nathann Cohen
Author: David Joyner | Merged:
Dependencies: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Old description:
> See the discussion at :
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/IyrgvrLch4M/discussion
>
> Here is a patch implementing a new doctest checking for correction, but
> so far the ryser method still needs to be fixed !
>
> Apply :
>
> * trac_11324.3.patch
> * trac_11324-reviewer.patch
>
> Nathann
New description:
See the discussion at :
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/IyrgvrLch4M/discussion
Apply :
* trac_11324.3.patch
* trac_11324-reviewer.patch
Nathann
--
Comment:
Gloops... `:-/`
This was an old bug, without any link to what we were adressing now. The
problem appeared when the function was given as an entry containing only
vectors ``[0]*n``. I fixed that in my updated patch, and ran the test.....
**MANY** times `:-)`
David ? Are you still around ? `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11324#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
