#11261: Update PolyBoRi to upstream release 0.7-1
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: AlexanderDreyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: None of the above - read trac
for reasoning.
Reviewer: | Author: Alexander Dreyer
Merged: | Dependencies:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by fbissey):
* component: algebra => packages
Comment:
Replying to [comment:17 AlexanderDreyer]:
> I have often several times that installing one package breaks some
completely unrelated tests, while replacing the spkg and building all Sage
from scratch works fine. Does {{{sage -ba}}} always suffice?
You are not entirely coherent there. Anyway in most case sage -b will
suffice, sage -ba if you want to be sure for the one with real widespread
use (pari for example). One thing that sage -b(a) doesn't do is rebuild
dependent packages I think. So if update numpy I should also rebuild
scipy. If I am not mistaken sage -b(a) won't do that for you.
If your comment was aimed at the problems I mentioned I have in sage-on-
gentoo on macos, don't worry that's irrelevant to the present issue. Just
expect me to mention it on bitbucket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11261#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
