#10552: Allow more elementwise simplifications for symbolic matrices
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: symbolics | Keywords: matrix symbolic simplify
expand
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Author: Joris Vankerschaver
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by jvkersch):
I really like the suggestion of moving the simplification methods to
somewhere closer to the maxima interface. I would like to look into this,
as it would give me a good chance of learning a more complex part of Sage.
In the meantime, I've uploaded a new version of the patch (I changed the
filename to include the patch number -- the other patch can be deleted),
but I'm still in two minds about optional parameters. Adding the
`expand=True` parameter to `simplify_trig` was easy as it just involved
one line of extra code, but for the other methods we run into the problems
mentioned earlier, and we would have to choose between duplicating the
code in `symbolic.expression.Expression` or calling the methods element-
wise. Hopefully the proposed change to the maxima interface will resolve
this...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10552#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
